Tuesday, 11 April 2023

Othello


Introduction :-


"Othello" is one of Shakespeare's most famous plays, known for its exploration of themes such as jealousy, love, betrayal, and racism. The play tells the story of Othello, a Moorish general in the Venetian army, and his tragic downfall at the hands of his ensign, Iago.


Plot Summary:-



The play begins with Roderigo, a disappointed suitor of Desdemona, complaining to Iago about his unrequited love. Iago, who secretly hates Othello and seeks revenge against him, convinces Roderigo to help him bring about Othello's downfall by stirring up trouble between Othello and his wife, Desdemona.


Iago manipulates everyone around him, including Othello, by planting false ideas and suspicions in their minds. He convinces Othello that Desdemona is having an affair with Cassio, Othello's trusted lieutenant, and uses every means possible to make Othello believe that Desdemona is unfaithful.


In the end, Othello kills Desdemona, believing that she has betrayed him, and then learns from Emilia, his wife's maid, that Iago is responsible for the deception. Othello then kills himself out of remorse and grief for what he has done.


Themes:-


Jealousy: The most prominent theme in "Othello" is jealousy. Iago's jealousy towards Cassio, whom he believes has been promoted over him unfairly, leads him to manipulate and deceive everyone around him, including Othello. Othello, too, becomes jealous of Cassio and Desdemona, and this jealousy leads to his downfall.


Love: The play explores various forms of love, including romantic love between Othello and Desdemona, the love between friends and comrades in arms, and the love of power and control. Love is shown to be both a positive and a negative force, as it drives some characters to noble deeds while leading others to their downfall.


Betrayal: Betrayal is another important theme in "Othello". Iago's manipulation and deception of Othello and others is the ultimate betrayal, as he uses their trust in him to further his own agenda. Othello feels betrayed by Desdemona and Cassio, whom he believes have betrayed him by having an affair.


Racism: The play also explores issues of race and racism. Othello, as a black man in a predominantly white society, faces discrimination and prejudice from some of the other characters in the play. This racism is a contributing factor in Othello's downfall, as it leads some characters to believe that he is inherently untrustworthy and prone to violence.



Characters of the Play :-


  1. Othello: A noble and well-respected general in the Venetian army, who is also a Moor (a black African). Othello is in love with Desdemona, but his jealousy and insecurity lead to his tragic downfall.


  1. Desdemona: Othello's wife and the daughter of a Venetian senator. Desdemona is kind, loyal, and innocent, but her love for Othello ultimately leads to her death.


  1. Iago: Othello's ensign, a manipulative and deceitful man who hates Othello and seeks revenge against him. Iago is the primary antagonist of the play and is responsible for much of the tragedy that unfolds.


  1. Cassio: A young and handsome soldier, who is Othello's loyal lieutenant. Cassio is implicated in Iago's scheme to discredit Othello and is ultimately promoted to take Othello's place as the leader of the Venetian army.


  1. Roderigo: A wealthy Venetian and one of Desdemona's suitors, who is manipulated by Iago to help bring about Othello's downfall.


  1. Emilia: Iago's wife and Desdemona's maidservant, who unwittingly becomes involved in Iago's plot and ultimately helps to expose his deception.


  1. Brabantio: Desdemona's father, a Venetian senator who disapproves of his daughter's marriage to Othello.


  1. Duke of Venice: The ruler of Venice, who relies on Othello to defend the city from external threats.


  1. Montano: The governor of Cyprus, where much of the play takes place.


These are the main characters of "Othello", each of whom plays an important role in the tragedy that unfolds.


Symbols :-


There are several symbols in this play. That are like.,


Handkerchief


The significance of red is love, red strawberries like red hearts on the love token handkerchief, and like the red stains from Othello and Desdemona's first night of love on the marriage sheets. Such red on white is private and dear to the heart of Othello, and he expects it to be similarly dear to his wife. It is the belief that Desdemona gave away his handkerchief, and the sexually implications of the gift, that drives him to kill her.


Candle


The candle Othello blows out just before he murders Desdemona symbolises him extinguishing her life.


Animals


Beginning in Act 1, Scene 1, Iago introduces the animalistic imagery. According to Iago, there is something bestial and animalistic about Othello ("The old black ram"); he's base and beastly, somehow beneath everyone else in Venice because of his North African heritage. The animal imagery permeates the play, often referring to Othello's "otherness."


Location


Shakespeare often uses different locations to represent mindsets. In Othello, Venice represents civilization, while Cyprus symbolises the wilderness. The idea is that what happened in the Cyprus never would happen in the civilised city of Venice.


Conclusion :-


Overall, "Othello" is a powerful exploration of human emotions and relationships, with themes that continue to resonate with audiences today.


      Thanks for Visiting...............


Tuesday, 28 March 2023

Assignment Paper:-110

 



Assignment Paper :-110 ( History of English Literature – From 1900 to 2000)



Name :- Aarti Bhupatbhai Sarvaiya 

Batch :- M.A. Sem. 2 (2022-2024)

Enrollment N/o. :-  4069206420220027

Roll N/o. :-  01

Subject Code & Paper N/o. :- 22403 Paper 110A: History of English Literature – From 1900 to 2000

Email Address :-  aartisarvaiya7010@gmail.com

Submitted to :- Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English        – Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University – Bhavnagar – 364001

Date of Submission :- 31 March, 2023




Modernist Artistic Movements of 20th Century 


Introduction -


The Early 20th Century was marked by rapid industrial, economic, social, and cultural change, which influenced the worldview of many and set the stage for new artistic movements.


The Modernism movement within art, arising in the early 20th century, referred to art that accurately reflected the society in which artists found themselves. After the French industrial revolution, artists demonstrated a great desire to move away from the traditional aspects that previously governed fine art in favor of creating artworks that sought to capture the experiences and values in modern industrial life. Thus, Modern Art existed as a broad movement that incorporated a variety of other “isms” under its title.


What Is Modernism?


Modern Art, Known as a global movement that existed in society and culture, Modern Art developed at the start of the 20th century in reaction to the widespread urbanization that appeared after the industrial revolution. Modern Art, also referred to as Modernism, was viewed as both an art and philosophical movement at the time of its emergence. This movement reflected the immense longing of artists to produce new forms of art, philosophy, and social structures that precisely reflected the newly developing world.


Modernism included a variety of different styles, techniques, and media within the broad movement. However, the fundamental principle that was demonstrated in all the artworks of each movement within Modernism was a complete dismissal of history and traditional concepts associated with realism.


"Artists began to make use of new images, materials, and techniques to create artworks that they thought better reflected the realities and hopes that existed in rapidly modernizing societies".


Due to the fact that it was not considered a singular and cohesive movement, many different movements developed that fell into the bracket of Modernism. These Modern movements included Post-Impressionism, Fauvism, Cubism, Dadaism, Expressionism, and Futurism, to name a few. 



About the 20th Century -


The 20th (twentieth) century began on January 1, 1901 (MCMI), and ended on December 31, 2000 (MM). The 20th century was dominated by significant events that defined the modern era: Spanish flu pandemic, World War I and World War II, nuclear weapons, nuclear power and space exploration, nationalism and decolonization, the Cold War and post-Cold War conflicts, and technological advances. These reshaped the political and social structure of the globe.


The century saw a major shift in the way that many people lived, with changes in politics, ideology, economics, society, culture, science, technology, and medicine. The 20th century may have seen more technological and scientific progress than all the other centuries combined since the dawn of civilization. Terms like nationalism, globalism, environmentalism, ideology, world war, genocide, and nuclear war entered common usage.



Characteristics of the 20th Century -


  1. Modernist writers were influenced by such thinkers as Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx, amongst others, who raised questions about the rationality of the human mind.

  2. Marked by a strong and intentional break with tradition. This break includes a strong reaction against established religious, political, and social views.

  3. A central preoccupation of Modernism is with the inner self and consciousness.

  4. The Modernist cares little for Nature, Being, or the overarching structures of history.

  5. The “unreliable” narrator supplanted the omniscient, trustworthy narrator of preceding centuries, and readers were forced to question even the most basic assumptions about how the novel should operate.

  6. There is no such thing as absolute truth. All things are relative.



Modernist Artistic Movements of the 20th Century -


The 20th century saw a new era of visual artists who challenged the precedent art styles. Beauty and aesthetics gave way to abstraction, expression and symbolism. This metamorphosis formed numerous distinct and important art movements which presented a new type of aesthetic, some which overlap with or influenced the others. Below is a broad overview of the most influential visual art movements during the 20th century, excluding some of those shorter-lived or lesser known.





  1. Impressionism (1870s – 1880s)




Seen as an important precursor to the Modernist movement, Impressionism made famous the use of non-naturalist colors in the artworks that were created. The importance of Impressionism was demonstrated by artist Claude Monet, whose landscape works focused on capturing transient moments of light and color in excruciating detail.


This attention to detail was also seen when artists chose the colors within their artworks, as these vivid and shocking colors were said to emphasize the emotions that they felt. Additionally, Impressionists made use of loose and highly textured brushstrokes that made the painting unrecognizable if viewed from up close. These specific techniques made Impressionism very disliked in the conventional art spheres, as the works created did not conform to the traditional elements of art.


This led to Impressionism being seen as an important influence of Modernism, as it was one of the initial movements to reject the realism associated with traditional art through the color palette and brush strokes used. Impressionism went on to validate the use of unrealistic colors in artworks, which went on to pave the way for the emergence of abstract art. This continued to be upheld as an important characteristic in the Modern Art movements that developed.



  1. Fauvism (1905 – 1907)



Led by Henri Matisse, Fauvism was an incredibly short-lived movement that existed during the mid-1900s in Paris. Despite its lifespan, it was an incredibly dynamic and influential movement and was seen as a very fashionable and modern style during its time. 


Fauvism is known for launching at the Salon d’Automne, with the movement becoming instantly renowned for its intense, loud, and non-naturalistic colors that were used in the artworks created. This excessive use of color made the previous movement of Impression seem monochromatic in its palette choice, with the use of colors being extremely exaggerated in Fauvism.


The major contribution of Fauvism to the Modern Art movement was its demonstration of the power of color. Fauvism showcased the independent strength that colors possessed, which turned artworks into a force to be reckoned with when various colors were combined. Additionally, Fauvism was seen as a highly subjective movement, existing as a strong contender to the previous classical artistic style that was used.


  1. Cubism (1908 – 1914)



Developed by artists Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, Cubism existed as quite a harsh and challenging style of painting. This art form differed greatly from previous movements that were inspired by the techniques of linear perspective and softly curved volumes made famous in the Renaissance. Instead, Cubism made use of a compositional arrangement of flat and shattered planes that were combined to make up a painting. 


Cubism was developed into two versions, namely Analytical Cubism and Synthetic Cubism. Analytical Cubism, which existed from 1910 to 1012, examined the use of basic shapes and overlapping surfaces to portray the individual forms of the subjects in a painting. Synthetic Cubism appeared after and ran from 1912 to 1914. This style emphasized on including characteristics such as simple shapes and bright colors that held hardly any depth in the artworks that were created.


Despite its influence over abstract art, the appeal surrounding Cubism was extremely limited. However, an important contribution of the Cubism movement within Modern Art was that it offered an entirely new alternative to standard perspective due to its creation of the flat picture plane. 



  1. Futurism (1909 – 1944)



The Futurist movement, founded by Italian art theorist and poet Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, was an art form that celebrated technology, speed, inventions such as the automobile and the airplane, and scientific achievement.


This movement saw all of these avenues of development as worthy of praise and believed that they were responsible for the advancement of modern society. Futurism captured the dynamism and energy that existed in the modern world and proposed the creation of art that celebrated modernity and the development of technology in all its forms.


Existing as a heavily influential movement, it borrowed elements from other eras such as Neo-Impressionism, Italian Divisionism, and Cubism. This was demonstrated through the splintered forms and numerous viewpoints that were typical of some Futurist artworks.


Futurism was at its most influential stage between 1909 and 1914, as World War One brought the first wave of Futurism to a close. This led artists to turn to different styles that incorporated elements of modernity. However, after the war had ended, Marinetti revived the movement and continued to develop into what was called second-generation Futurism. Thus, Futurism was seen as a significant Modern Art movement as it introduced the element of movement into art and linked the concept of beauty to scientific achievement. 




4. Dadaism (1915-1924)




Dada was an international art movement originating in the early 20th century. It created absurd, nihilistic and sometimes incomprehensible art. Dada blurred the lines between visual, performance, and literary arts.


It was led by artists like Hugo Ball, Marcel Duchamp and Sophie Tauber. Its legacy shook the art world quite possibly changed the definition of art itself.


Dada was developed during World War I in Zurich as an avant-garde, anti-art movement. It rejected and mocked the capitalist and nationalistic cultural climate of World War I, focusing instead on the irrational, nonsensical and absurd with strong anti-bourgeois overtones. The movement spread throughout Europe and the United States, echoing far-left radical thought and the overall discontentment with the violence of wartime.


Known artists :- Man Ray, Marcel Duchamp, Hans Arp, Hannah Höch, Tristan Tzara



  1. Surrealism (1924 – 1950s)



Highly influenced by Sigmund Freud and psychoanalysis, Surrealism sought expression through the exploration of the unconscious mind. Its imagery was characterised by unsettling, dreamlike settings with juxtaposing and often deformed subject matter. Having developed from the avant-garde Dada movement, Surrealism began in Europe and expanded throughout the western world as a cultural, artistic and literary movement.



Known artists: André Breton, Salvador Dalí, Max Ernst, Frida Kahlo, Rene Magritte



  1. Expressionism 



Expressionism was a modernist movement, beginning with poetry and painting, that originated in Germany at the start of the 20th century. It emphasised subjective experience, manipulating perspective for emotional effect in order to evoke moods or ideas. Expressionist artists sought to express meaning or emotional experience rather than physical reality.


Expressionism was developed as an avant-garde style before the First World War and remained popular during the Weimar Republic, particularly in Berlin. The style extended to a wide range of the arts, including painting, literature, theatre, dance, film, architecture, and music.


It  can be characterised by evocative and emotional pieces that are typically abstract. The use of traditional representation was discarded in favour of communicating the emotion or meaning behind the work. This use of thematic rather than literal expression revolutionised western visual art and became an antecedent for many other 20th-century movements.


Known artists :- Edvard Munch, Egon Schiele, Paul Klee, Wassily Kandinsky,Die Brücke,Der Blaue Reiter.



  1. Abstract expressionism



Abstract expressionism is the term applied to new forms of abstract art developed by American painters such as Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko and Willem de Kooning in the 1940s and 1950s. It is often characterised by gestural brush-strokes or mark-making, and the impression of spontaneity.



  1. Pop art



Pop art is an art movement that emerged in the 1950s and flourished in the 1960s in America and Britain, drawing inspiration from sources in popular and commercial culture. Different cultures and countries contributed to the movement during the 1960s and 70s.



Conclusion -


To sum up, we can say that at the 20th Century Art is only the way of people through which they expresses their emotions and feelings. They were used different Art's to express their inner-voice. Lots of Artistic movements were developed at that time as a result of the World War.


Word Count :- 1990



Assignment Paper:-109

 


Assignment Paper :-109 ( Literary Theory & Criticism and Indian Aesthetics)



Name :- Aarti Bhupatbhai Sarvaiya 

Batch :- M.A. Sem. 2 (2022-2024)

Enrollment N/o. :-  4069206420220027

Roll N/o. :-  01

Subject Code & Paper N/o. :- 22402 Paper 109: Literary Theory & Criticism and Indian Aesthetics

Email Address :-  aartisarvaiya7010@gmail.com

Submitted to :- Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English        – Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University – Bhavnagar – 364001

Date of Submission :- 31 March, 2023




Indian Poetics Vs Western literary criticism 



Introduction :-


Indian Poetics & Aesthetics is all about analysis of literature especially Poetries. There are several chief Indian Aesthetics & Poetics who came up with the various theories which we used alot in our literature as well as in our day to day life but we don't have any idea about that and that Poetics introduce us with those theories. 



Those theories include Rasa, Dhvani, Vakrokty,Alankara, Riti, Auchitya and Ramniyata. These all theories are in the Sanskrit Language.




About Indian Poetics :-

Indian aesthetics is earlier than western aesthetics. Before Italian philosopher Croce there was no real aesthetics in the West. The first available book of this discipline in India is NatyaShastra, presumed to be authored by Bharata, who is thus accepted to be the first acharya (aesthetician) of the Sanskrit poetics. The last eminent acharya of this science is Panditraja Jagannatha, the author of Rasagangadhara, Bharata is believed to be belonging to between 5 c. BC to 2 B.C. The Sanskrit poetics thus is widespread over a period of one and a half or two thousand years.


The stand, regarding principles of poetry which were prevalent at the time of Bharata, changed during the period of Bhamah and Dandin, the authors of Kavyalamkārā and Kavyadarsha, belonging to 6th and 7 c AD. Bharata was an exponent of rasa, i.e, sentiment, while Bhamah and Dandin were of alankara, ie, embellishment or figurative beauty. According to both these acharyas, rasa was taken to be a mode.



In the 9 e. A. D. three acharyas by name of Vamana, Udbhata and Anandavardhana came into existence in this field They are the authors of Kavyalankara-sutra-vritti ,



Kavyalamkārāa-sara-samgraha 



and Dhvanyaloka in respective order. Among these Vamana, supporting riti (poetic diction or style), had declared it to be the amman (essence or soul) of poetry, while Udbhata, the follower of Bhamaha and dandin, was an adherent of alamkārāa, but Anandvardhana accepted dhvani (an aesthetic suggestivity) as the soul of poetry. 


On the basis of this theory he shifted the Sanskrit Poetics into a new direction. That is why he is said to be an epoch-making acharya. 



However for about two hundred years many aestheticians refuted the theory of dhvani Chief among them are Dhananjaya (10 c. A D) the author of Dasarupaka, who included dhvani into fatparya- vriti (the function of the words called purport), Kuntaka (10 & 11" c. A. D.), the author of Vakrotijivita (vakrokti clever speech or artful expression and Mahimabhatta (11 e A. D.), the author of Vyakti Viveka, who included divani into anumana (an inference).



But Mammata (11 c. A. D.) the author of Kavyaprakasa, through his profound exposition, refuting all the adversaries of divani, defended and re-established the theory of divani indisputably, and throughout six centuries ahead, this doctrine was accepted by all the acharyas Even Jayadeva (13 c. A. D.), who had accepted alankara to be an inseparable component of poetry, dealt with dhvani in his book Chandralekha Vishvanatha (14 c. A. D.) though established Rasa as an atman of poetry, yet, while treating the theory of dhvani with all its varieties and sub-varieties in his book Sahitya Darpan, accepted Rasa as an important variety of deviant. The last acharya Jagannath advocated this theory with full faith in it.





Indian Poetics Vs Western literary criticism :-


The Western tradition of literary theory and criticism essentially derives from the Greeks, and there is a sense in which Plato, Aristotle, and Longinus mark out positions and debates that are still being played out today. At a moment when we are questioning the sufficiency of such Western critical methods to make sense of the plethora of literatures produced by the world’s cultures, it may be useful to remind ourselves that other equally ancient classical critical traditions exist. There is an unbroken line of literary theory and criticism in Indian culture that goes back at least as far as the Western tradition. Indian criticism constitutes an important and largely untapped resource for literary theorists, as the Indian tradition in important respects assigns a more central role to literature than the Greek tradition does.


No concept in Western literary criticism occupies as pro- minent a place as rasa does in Indian poetics; indeed, according to many students of Sanskrit poetics, "a work of art is artistic only when it evokes the experience of rasa"


The theory of rasa seeks to explain everything through the emotions and we must ask how far rasa can be rendered compatible with categories of Western thought. Rasa is the reader's total emotional response to the text; it describes also the dominant emotion of a literary work, and the abstract enjoyment of such an emotion. A work may well engender several emotions: some emotions, having no independent existence, get swallowed up by other emotions, while others are rather more durable.


V.K. Chari points out, the theory of rasa does not allow the possibility of a 'cocktail' of emotions leading to some new delectable mixture: one emotion must dominate. He finds in the work of the eighteenth-century Scottish critic Kames, with his distinction between 'discordant emotions' and 'concordant emotions', and in Coleridge's notion of the 'unity of effect', considerable affinities to the theory of rasa, but avers that rasa offers a more "comprehensive and convincing account of poetic semantics and a consistent general theory of poetry".


If the theory of rasa can be made meaningful to Western readers by showing its affinity to certain strains in Western aesthetics and literary criticism, one can also attempt to find parallels for other concepts which were the stock and trade of Sanskrit theorists. They appear to have had a firm conviction that the language of poetry is distinctive in that it deviates from the commonplace, is a heightened form of expression, or is otherwise striking. 


Speaking of Kuntaka, "the greatest exponent of the theory of vakrokti," Pathak finds that "his views offer the most striking similarities with modern Western analytic criticism" . Pathak likens vakrokti to the 'oblique approach' of Pound and Eliot, F.W. Bateson's stress on the 'connotations' of poetry, Allen Tate's concept of 'tension', and R.P. Blackmur's views on poetic language as 'gesture'. P.S. Sastri, meanwhile, in his essay on "Indian Poetics and New Criticism", construes 'Cleanth Brooks' 'paradox' and Empson's 'ambiguity' as analo- gues to vakrokti. Irony, ambiguity, gesture, paradox, tension, and a host of other concepts all approximate vakrokti, but yakrokti is much bigger than any of them, or even all of them put together. Thus several of our contributors note with evident pride "that the modern critical creed of the search for irony, paradox and ambiguity was anticipated in India hundreds of years ago". The expansiveness of the concept of vakrokti is said to be matched only by its antiquity.


For Example., Dominant emotion of Hamlet , shows how rasa, vakrokti, dhvani or any other element of Sanskrit poetics is to be employed in the task of practical criticism. Had this been attempted, it would have helped one to demarcate one concept from the other and equally from categories of Western thought, besides demonstrating how Indian poetics can enrich our understanding of works of literature, particularly those belonging to the modern period.


Oak tree as 'the tree', and there will be no ambiguity. The personal emotion of such a conversation would be described by Sanskrit theorists as bhava. At a higher level of abstraction, at a greater remove from the realm of the purely personal, "one can speak with carpenters about the fact that some trees are more useful than others for their craft." Or one can talk about love or anger, which are 'permanent emotions', the sthayi-bhava, that are within everyone's experience. "Or one can speak at a very high level of abstraction...of trees being made only by God." It is at this level of impersonal enjoyment and aesthetic delight" that one can speak of rasa. As Dimock remarks, "it is of course the common denominator 'tree', 'meaning all kinds of tall, barked, needles or leafy plants, that allow us to communicate with that vast proportion of the human race who have seen trees but who are neither carpenters nor intimate picnickers".


Whatever may be the intricacies of the rasa and bhava theory, Dimock is more interested in how Sanskrit poetics may be used to explicate some difficult questions of translation and interpretation. Whether poetry is really translatable at all is a question that has engaged many minds, and Dimock offers the intriguing suggestion that, with reference to Sanskrit poetics, translation is only possible on the level of the sthayi-bhava. He drives his point Rasa may well be the dominant theory of classical Sanskrit poetics, but for too long we have assumed that it has a monolithic character. 


There is not one Ramayana in India, but nearly forty; and similarly the rasa theory, which may be likened to the trunk of a gigantic tree, has sprouted many branches. The study of Sanskrit poetics, and particularly the rasa theory, has been largely denuded of its significance by the tendency of scholars to resort to platitudes and vague generalities.




Conclusion :-


To Conclude, Indian Poetics mostly focuses on the intention of the works and Western literary critics mostly focuses on the mistakes or a figurative language. In some ways ,both are quite similar but it differs from their views towards literature. 




Word Count :- 1630