Breath by Samuel Beckett

 Hello everyone, I'm a student of the Department of English,M.K.B.U. This blog is assigned by Dr. Dilip Barad Sir, in this blog I'm going to make one video on Samuel Beckett's shortest play 'Breath' and also give some basic information about the Play and my interpretation for the video. What is my intention or interpretation towards my video . 

Basic information about the play :-

"Breath" is a very short play by Samuel Beckett, consisting of just 35 seconds of stage time.The play has been interpreted in many ways, but it is often seen as a commentary on the brevity and fragility of human life, as well as a reflection on the futility of existence.

• Title: Breath

• Author: Samuel Beckett

• Year of publication: 1969

• Genre: Experimental drama

• Length: 35 seconds

• Number of characters: None (a lone figure lies prone on stage)

• Setting: An empty room with two windows high up

• Themes: Brevity and fragility of human life, futility of existence, the cycle of life and death

• Style: Minimalist, absurdist, existentialist

• Significance: "Breath" is often seen as a groundbreaking work of experimental theatre, as it challenges traditional notions of plot, character, and dialogue. It has also been interpreted as a commentary on the human condition, as it explores the themes of birth, death, and the cycle of life. The play has been influential in the development of avant-garde theatre and performance art.

The script of the play:-

CURTAIN Up

1. Faint light on stage littered with miscellaneous rubbish. Hold about five seconds.

2. Faint brief cry and immediately inspiration and slow increase of light together reaching maximum - together in about ten seconds. Silence and hold for about five seconds.

3. Expiration and slow decrease of light together reaching minimum together (light as in 1) in about ten seconds and immediately cry as before. Silence and hold about five seconds. 

CURTAIN Down

Video based on 'Breath' :-

My interpretation  :-

In this video I tries to define today's situation of the people that how they use technology and how the people are busy with an unusual things like games and reels they wastes their time in watching or playing in mobile. People have not time to play physical games or reading books but they have a time for playing video games and watching reels. Through this video I tried to define what are the values of books and physical games and art like paintings and other things in today's world.

                        ====================

Northrop Frye

Hello everyone, I'm a student of the Department of English,M.K.B.U. This blog is a part of thinking activity given by Dr. Dilip Barad Sir in which we have to give the answers of several questions with the use of chat.gpt.

 1). What is Archetypal Criticism?

Archetypal criticism is a literary theory that focuses on the recurring patterns or symbols in literature that represent universal human experiences. It is based on the idea that all human beings share a common set of experiences and emotions, and that these experiences and emotions are reflected in the myths, stories, and symbols that are found in literature.

According to archetypal criticism, literature contains archetypes, which are universal patterns, images, or symbols that are present in the collective unconscious of all human beings. These archetypes can be found in myths, fairy tales, and other forms of storytelling, as well as in everyday life.

Archetypal criticism is often associated with the work of Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist who believed that the human psyche is made up of both a conscious and an unconscious mind, and that the collective unconscious is made up of universal symbols and experiences that are shared by all human beings. Archetypal critics use Jung's theory to analyse literature, looking for common patterns and symbols that reflect the human experience.

According to Frye, archetypal criticism is a way of interpreting literature that focuses on the underlying patterns and structures that shape literary works.Frye believed that literature is full of recurring patterns and symbols, which he called "archetypes." These archetypes are universal, meaning that they are present in all cultures and times, and are part of what Frye called the "mythological framework" of human experience.

Frye argued that the study of archetypes is important for understanding literature because it reveals the deeper meanings and structures that underlie a work. By identifying the archetypes that are present in a literary work, the critic can gain insight into the work's themes and symbols, and can see how the work fits into the broader context of human culture and experience.

Frye's approach to archetypal criticism was heavily influenced by the work of Carl Jung, as well as the ideas of literary theorists such as William Blake and Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Frye's work helped to establish archetypal criticism as an important approach to literary interpretation.

In archetypal criticism, the critic examines the use of archetypes in a literary work, and considers how these archetypes reflect and reinforce universal human experiences and values. By analysing the archetypes in a work of literature, the critic can gain a deeper understanding of the work's themes and meanings, and can shed light on the ways in which the work connects to the wider human experience.

2). What is the contribution of Northrop Frye in Archetypal Criticism?

Northrop Frye was a prominent literary critic who made significant contributions to the development of archetypal criticism. Here are a few of his major contributions:

1. The Anatomy of Criticism: In his influential book "Anatomy of Criticism," Frye introduced the concept of "archetypal criticism," which he defined as the study of the underlying patterns and structures that shape literary works. He argued that literature is full of recurring patterns and symbols, or "archetypes," which are universal and part of what he called the "mythological framework" of human experience.

2. The Theory of Modes: Frye developed a theory of literary modes that classified works of literature into four major categories: comedy, tragedy, romance, and irony/satire. Each mode is associated with different archetypes, and Frye argued that a work's mode helps to determine its meaning and structure.

3. The Concept of the Monomyth: Frye was one of the first literary critics to recognize the importance of the "monomyth" or "hero's journey," which is a recurring pattern in mythology and literature. He argued that the hero's journey is a universal archetype that reflects the human experience of transformation and growth.

4. The Influence of William Blake: Frye was heavily influenced by the work of the poet and artist William Blake, and he saw Blake as a key figure in the development of archetypal criticism. Frye believed that Blake's work was full of archetypes and that his emphasis on imagination and symbolism was important for understanding the deeper meanings of literature.

Overall, Frye's work helped to establish archetypal criticism as an important approach to literary interpretation and influenced generations of literary critics and scholars.

3). What do Archetypal Critics do? Explain with examples.

Archetypal critics analyze literature to identify recurring patterns, symbols, and themes that reflect universal human experiences. They focus on the use of archetypes, which are symbols or images that are present in the collective unconscious of all human beings. Archetypal critics believe that the use of archetypes in literature can reveal deeper meanings and structures that underlie a work.

• Here are some examples of what archetypal critics do:

Analyse archetypes in myths and fairy tales: Archetypal critics often look at traditional myths and fairy tales to identify common archetypes. For example, the hero's journey, a recurring pattern in myths and legends, is an archetype that involves a hero embarking on a quest or journey that leads to transformation and growth. Archetypal critics might look for similar patterns in contemporary literature.

Identify archetypes in characters and symbols: Archetypal critics also analyse the use of archetypes in characters and symbols in literature. For example, the wise old mentor is an archetype that appears in many stories, from Gandalf in "The Lord of the Rings" to Obi-Wan Kenobi in "Star Wars." Archetypal critics might look for similar archetypes in other stories to see how they contribute to the work's meaning and structure.

Look for archetypal patterns in literature: Archetypal critics examine literature for patterns that reflect universal human experiences. For example, the archetype of the mother figure appears in many stories as a symbol of nurturing and protection. Archetypal critics might analyse how this archetype is used in a particular work to explore the work's themes and meanings.

Overall, archetypal critics focus on the use of archetypes in literature to uncover deeper meanings and structures that are universal to human experience. By examining archetypes, they can gain insight into the work's themes and symbols, and can see how the work fits into the broader context of human culture and experience.

4). "Every organized body of knowledge can be learned progressively; and experience shows that there is also something progressive about the learning of literature. Our opening sentence has already got us into a semantic difficulty." Explain the semantic difficulty.

The semantic difficulty that Frye refers to in the opening sentence of his essay on archetypal criticism is the use of the term "progressive" to describe the learning of literature. Frye suggests that this term is problematic because it implies that literary knowledge can be acquired in a linear and cumulative way, like the acquisition of scientific or mathematical knowledge.

However, Frye argues that the learning of literature is not necessarily progressive in this sense. Literary knowledge is not acquired in a straightforward, linear way, but rather through a process of exploration and discovery. Frye suggests that this process involves "moving backward and forward between the text and one's own experience, constantly discovering new facets of both."

In other words, the learning of literature is not simply a matter of acquiring new information or building on previous knowledge, but involves a more complex and dynamic process of engagement with the text. This is why Frye argues that the term "progressive" is problematic when applied to the learning of literature, as it implies a kind of linear development that does not capture the complexity of the process

5). "The relation of criticism to religion, when they deal with the same documents, is more complicated. In criticism, as in history, the divine is always treated as a human artefact. God for the critic, whether he finds him in Paradise Lost or the Bible, is a character in a human story".

In this passage from his essay on archetypal criticism, Northrop Frye is discussing the relationship between criticism and religion. Frye suggests that when a critic analyzes a religious text, such as the Bible, they treat the divine as a human artifact rather than as a sacred entity. The critic sees God as a character in a human story, subject to the same analysis and interpretation as any other character.

Frye's point here is that criticism and religion have fundamentally different approaches to understanding the divine. Religion views the divine as a sacred entity that is beyond human understanding, while criticism treats the divine as a literary or cultural artifact. This does not mean that criticism is necessarily dismissive of religion, but rather that it approaches religious texts from a different perspective than a religious believer might.

Frye's view on this matter reflects his broader belief that literature is a cultural artifact that reflects the myths and symbols of a particular culture. He suggests that literary criticism can help to uncover the deeper meanings and structures that underlie these cultural artifacts, including religious texts. However, this does not mean that literary criticism can replace or negate the religious beliefs of individuals who hold them. Rather, it is a different way of approaching and understanding these texts.

Word Count:- 1500

Images :- 01

War Poetry

 Hello everyone, I'm a student of the Department of English,M.K.B.U. This blog is a response to the thinking activity given by Megha Ma'am. In this blog I'm going to write a basic information of war poetry and it is mainly focused on one Bollywood movie 'Tanhaji', and in this blog I'm going to do analysis on this movie,which is based on war. 

What is war poetry? :- 

The First World War had a far-reaching effect on English poetry. It provided a new source of inspiration for the poets of established reputation and brought to public notice many poets, particularly among the young men who fought in the war. Moreover, it serves as a great social document. There can be no clearer reflection of the changing national attitude to the war than that found in war poetry. Broadly two phases of the national attitude can be distinguished in war poetry. The first was one of patriotic fervour, almost of rejoicing in the opportunity of self-sacrifice in the cause of human freedom, and a revival of the romantic conception of the knight-at-arms (Albert). Many poets who lived and served throughout the war had this patriotic fervour of the early years unaffected. But as the carnage went on increasing and there was no hope of its end, other poets arose with the declared intention of blasting this romantic illusion of the glory of war by a frank realistic depiction of the horrors, savagery and futility of war. This realistic attitude to the war was at first cried down as unpatriotic, but it has stood the test of time better than the romantic attitude of the early years. The poets of the 1914-18 war divide themselves into two groups- romantic war poets and realistic war poets.

The types of war poetry depend upon the perspectives of the people writing it. There is patriotic poetry, which honours the sacrifice and bravery of the soldiers who fight for their country. Anti-war poetry sees no glory in war but only destruction and suffering. Witness poetry is written by those who experience the effects of war first hand but are not participants in the fighting. The poetry of soldiers describes the experience of fighting in a war.

Wilfred Owen,Siegfried Sassoon and Rupert Brooke are considered romantic Poets who mainly wrote patriotic poems.Wilfred Owen,Siegfried Sassoon,Rupert Brooke,Isaac Rosenberg,John McCrae,Laurence Binyon and Charles Sorley ,these Poet's are considered as realistic poets who mainly wrote Anti-war poetry.

Here are some Bollywood movies, songs, and music which describes the theme of  war:-

Tanhaji Movie  :-

Introduction :-

Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior" can be considered a war movie. It is a historical action film based on the life of Tanaji Malusare, a military leader in the Maratha Empire, and his fight against the Mughal Empire to reclaim the fortress of Kondana. The movie includes battle scenes, strategy and tactics of war, and highlights the bravery and sacrifices of the soldiers.

Historical Context of this movie :-

"Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior" is based on a historical event, specifically the Battle of Sinhagad that took place in 1670 AD. The movie is a dramatised retelling of the story of Tanaji Malusare, a Maratha warrior who led a successful mission to capture the fortress of Kondana (now known as Sinhagad) from the Mughal army.

Tanaji Malusare was a trusted lieutenant of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the founder of the Maratha Empire. According to historical accounts, Tanaji and his troops climbed the steep slopes of the fortress using ropes and ladders, and fought a fierce battle against the Mughal forces led by Udaybhan Rathod.

Plot Overview of the movie :-

"Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior" is a 2020 Indian historical action film directed by Om Raut and produced by Ajay Devgn, who also stars in the lead role of Tanaji Malusare, a legendary Maratha warrior from the 17th century. The movie also features Saif Ali Khan, Kajol, Sharad Kelkar, and others in prominent roles.

The movie is set in 1670 when the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb sends his trusted commander Udaybhan Rathod (played by Saif Ali Khan) to capture the Kondana fort, a strategic location that would give the Mughals control over the southern part of India. In response, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj (played by Sharad Kelkar) appoints Tanaji Malusare to lead the charge and take back the fort from the Mughals.

The movie is a grand spectacle with elaborate battle scenes, breathtaking visuals, and stunning VFX. It also showcases the culture and traditions of the Maratha Empire, their values and customs, and the bravery and sacrifices of their soldiers. The film was widely appreciated for its direction, performances, and technical aspects, and was a commercial success at the box office.

Themes of this movie :-

1. Patriotism:- This theme centers around Tanaji Malusare's deep love for his country and his people. Throughout the movie, he is shown as a loyal and committed soldier who is willing to do whatever it takes to protect his homeland and his fellow Marathas. The theme of patriotism is also expressed through the character of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, who is depicted as a wise and just king who inspires his people to fight for their freedom and their way of life.

2. Sacrifice:- This theme is closely related to patriotism and heroism, and refers to the willingness of the characters to put their lives on the line for a greater cause. Tanaji Malusare, in particular, is shown as a selfless and courageous warrior who is willing to risk everything to protect his people and his land. The theme of sacrifice is also expressed through the character of Jijabai, Tanaji's mother, who gives her blessing to her son's mission despite the danger it poses.

3. Heroism:- This theme is closely linked to the other themes of patriotism and sacrifice, and refers to the qualities of courage, bravery, and nobility that are displayed by the characters. Tanaji Malusare is the primary hero of the movie, but other characters such as Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Suryaji Malusare, and others are also shown as heroes in their own right. The theme of heroism is often expressed through the battle scenes, where the characters demonstrate their courage and skill in combat.

4. Conflict:- This theme refers to the historical conflict between the Maratha and Mughal Empires, and the struggle for power and control over the Indian subcontinent. The Mughals are depicted as ruthless and oppressive invaders who want to dominate and subjugate the native population, while the Marathas are shown as brave defenders of their land and their way of life. The theme of conflict is often expressed through the battle scenes and the political maneuverings of the characters.

5. Cultural Heritage:- This theme refers to the importance of preserving one's cultural heritage and traditions, and the need to resist external forces that threaten them. The movie portrays the Maratha Empire as a rich and vibrant culture with its own traditions and customs, and shows how the characters are willing to fight to protect and preserve them. This theme is often expressed through the scenes that depict Maratha customs and traditions, and the characters' reverence for their cultural heritage.

Overall, these themes are interconnected and work together to create a rich and complex narrative that celebrates the courage, sacrifice, and patriotism of the characters, while also exploring the historical context and cultural significance of their story.

Conclusion :- 

This movie is based on the war between Maratha and Mughals and in this movie the Hero sacrifices his life for his nation. So , we can consider this movie as a war movie.

Word Count :- 1262

Images :- 

Practical Criticism - Figurative Language

 Hello friends, I'm a student of the Department of English,M.K.B.U. This blog is a part of Thinking Activity which is given by Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. In this blog I'm going to do an analytical study of the poem 'THE BREAD OF THE PEOPLE'  WRITTEN BY BERTOLT BRECHT. 

Points to Ponder :-

• Introduction

• About Poet 'Bertolt Brecht'. 

• A Poem 'The Bread of The People'

• Problematic things of this poem

• Poetic Devices which are used in this poem :-

• Poet's point of view towards a Poem

• Conclusion

1. Introduction :-

A Poem 'The Bread of The People' is written by Bertolt Brecht. It is written in blank Verse and it consists of 30 lines. In this poem ,the poet compares Justice with Bread and he also tries to define how people accept justice or how they take justice . He also tries to define what is the importance of justice in our life. 

2. About Poet :-

Bertolt Brecht, original name Eugen Berthold Friedrich Brecht,  German poet, playwright, and theatrical reformer whose epic theatre departed from the conventions of theatrical illusion and developed the drama as a social and ideological forum for leftist causes.

Brecht created numerous plays and theatrical productions during his career, including Die Dreigroschenoper (1928; The Threepenny Opera), The Caucasian Chalk Circle (first produced in English, 1948; Der kaukasische Kreidekreis, 1949), and Mutter Courage und ihre Kinder (1941; Mother Courage and Her Children).

Brecht influenced the history of drama by creating epic theatre, which was based on the idea that the theatre should not seek to make its audience believe in the presence of the characters on the stage but instead make it realise that what it sees on the stage is merely an account of past events.

His Notable Works: “A Manual of Piety” “Baal” “Drums in the Night” “Herr Puntila and His Man Matti” “Kleines Organon für das Theater” “Mahagonny".

3. A Poem 'The Bread of The People' :-

Justice is the bread of the people
Sometimes is plentiful, sometimes it is scarce
Sometimes it tastes good, sometimes it tastes bad.
When the bread is scarce, there is hunger.
When the bread is bad, there is discontent.
Throw away the bad justice
Baked without love, kneaded without knowledge!
Justice without flavour, with a grey crust
The stale justice which comes too late!
If the bread is good and plentiful
The rest of the meal can be excused.
One cannot have plenty of everything all at once.
Nourished by the bread of justice
The work can be achieved
From which plenty comes.
As daily bread is necessary
So is daily justice.
It is even necessary several times a day.
From morning till night, at work, enjoying oneself.
At work which is an enjoyment.
In hard times and in happy times
The people requires the plentiful, wholesome
Daily bread of justice.
Since the bread of justice, then, is so important
Who, friends, shall bake it?
Who bakes the other bread?
Like the other bread
The bread of justice must be baked
By the people.
Plentiful, wholesome, daily.
________________________________

4. Problematic things of this poem :-

1).  Comparison between Bread and Justice becomes problematic in some ways .

e.g. :- "Justice is the bread of the people"

Bread has tastes but Justice doesn't have any kind of taste. We cannot eat justice,we cannot touch justice,we cannot see justice.

  "Justice without flavour" 

Justice doesn't have any kind of flavour, it has a type. 'Flavour' can be used for Bread not for Justice.

According to Poet justice and Bread both are similar because we cannot touch justice or eat justice but we can judge it. Both are made by people and both can be good or bad. 

3). "The Bread of Justice"

Here in this line Bread is used as a metaphor for justice but Bread is a far-fetched metaphor because Bread is concrete and Justice is an abstract. We can touch ,see,and eat Bread but we cannot eat ,touch and see justice. 

So, Bread is a far-fetched metaphor for Justice and Justice is not a Bread,so we cannot consider Justice as the bread of justice. But if we see as per the Poet's point of view then we can say that this metaphor  connects with Justice .

For  e.g. :- Bread and justice both are not similar for all humans. Rich people can get both the things easily but for poor people it becomes too hard to get both the things. Even Rich people get it unlimited or as they want but poor people cannot have choice to get this things. 

5. Poetic Devices which are used in this poem :-

1). Metaphor:- 

"Justice is the bread of the people"

 The speaker compares justice to bread, implying that just as bread is a basic necessity for survival, justice is a fundamental requirement for the people. The metaphor extends throughout the poem as the speaker describes the qualities of good and bad justice and how it affects the people.

2). Personification:- The speaker gives human qualities to the concept of justice by saying "Throw away the bad justice baked without love, kneaded without knowledge." This personification emphasises the importance of justice and how it should be created with care and attention.

3). Repetition:- The speaker repeats the phrase "the bread of justice" several times, emphasising the central idea of the poem and the importance of justice to the people.

4). Rhetorical Question:- The speaker asks the question "Who, friends, shall bake it?" implying that the responsibility of creating justice lies with the people themselves. This rhetorical question is meant to engage the reader and encourage them to think about their role in creating justice.

6. Poet's point of view towards a Poem :-

In the poem, Brecht compares justice to a person's daily bread. The bread, which stands for justice, is both plentiful and scarce at different times, and it has both good and awful flavours. Hunger is a result of a lack of justice, but discontentment is a result of a poor perception of justice.

The poet continues by saying that in his opinion, bad justice is like a loaf of bread that has been cooked without love and kneaded without wisdom but has a grey crust. The bad justice is ultimately the one that is made too late. The other meals can be skipped if there is delicious, ample bread or justice. However, the reality is that a person never always receives Justice.

Similarly, bread is a daily requirement that supports our ability to preserve our lives. Another constant requirement that is unavoidable is justice. Justice is required throughout the day in a variety of circumstances. Whatever the circumstances- happy or difficult-we must eat to survive, and that is justice.

Finally, the poet poses a fundamental query, such as "Who bakes the bread of justice?" And he provides an answer to that query. They have spent their entire lives perfecting the art of breadmaking.The poet explains how individuals bring about their own justice.

7. Conclusion :-

So, throughout this poem we can get the idea how justice is important in our life and how it can compare with the Bread. Bread and Justice both are similar because if we are hungry then we do not find faults in the food similarly if the justice is in favour of us then we accept it happily instead of finding the faults in it. 

Word Count :- 1100

Images :- 01

Waiting For Godot by Samuel Beckett

 Hello friends, I'm a student of the Department of English,M.K.B.U. This blog is a part of Thinking Activity which is given by Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. In this blog I'm going to write about Samuel Beckett's one famous play 'Waiting For Godot' and also give the answers of the questions which are given by Dilip Barad Sir.

Waiting For Godot 

• Samuel Beckett

Points to Ponder :-

• Introduction

• About Samuel Beckett

• About The Play 'Waiting For Godot '

• 'Waiting For Godot' as a Theatre of Absurd :-

• Answers of the Questions 

• Conclusion

Introduction :-

Waiting for Godot is a play by Samuel Beckett in which two characters, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), engage in a variety of discussions and encounters while awaiting the titular Godot, who never arrives. 

About Samuel Beckett :-

Samuel Barclay Beckett (/bɛkit/; 13 April 1906-22 December 1989) was an Irish novelist, poet , dramatist, short story writer, theatre director, poet, and literary translator. His literary and theatrical work features bleak, impersonal and tragicomic experiences of life, often coupled with black comedy and nonsense.

He studied French and Italian, completing a M.A. in French at Trinity College. After travelling in England and in Europe he settled permanently in Paris, except for a brief hiatus during World War II. Beckett‟s time in France also coincided with an active period in Existential philosophy, most of it centred in Paris. Existentialism is a philosophy focused on existence and how a person exists in the world. The philosophy holds that people do not have an inherent nature or essence, but instead define their "self" through their actions and choices. While Beckett is not an Existentialist, a generally existential view of the human condition comes through very clearly in the play.

Beckett was awarded the 1969 Nobel Prize in Literature "for his writing, which-in new forms for the novel and drama-in the destitution of modern man acquires its elevation".

About The Play 'Waiting For Godot ' :-

Waiting for Godot, tragicomedy in two acts by Irish writer Samuel Beckett, published in 1952 in French as En attendant Godot and first produced in 1953. Waiting for Godot was a true innovation in drama and the 'Theatre of the Absurd' first theatrical success.

The play consists of conversations between Vladimir and Estragon, who are waiting for the arrival of the mysterious Godot, who continually sends word that he will appear but who never does. They encounter Lucky and Pozzo, they discuss their miseries and their lots in life, they consider hanging themselves, and yet they wait. Often perceived as being tramps, Vladimir and Estragon are a pair of human beings who do not know why they were put on earth; they make the tenuous assumption that there must be some point to their existence, and they look to Godot for enlightenment. Because they hold out hope for meaning and direction, they acquire a kind of nobility that enables them to rise above their futile existence.

• 'Waiting For Godot' as a Theatre of Absurd :-

In 1945, World War II ended, leaving behind widespread destruction and more than 60 million casualties, including 6 million Jews and others killed in the Holocaust. For many, the world appeared chaotic and meaningless. Shortly thereafter, a new theatre genre called the “theatre of the Absurd” emerged. For playwrights of this genre, “absurd” meant “out of harmony” rather than “ridiculous.” Such theatre startled audiences by breaking from traditional stage techniques, raising questions instead of providing answers, and expressing an inability to make sense of human actions, choices, and indeed, life itself. Waiting for Godot illustrates a number of significant “Absurd” characteristics:

1. Instead of having a problem that is solved... Theater of the Absurd resolves nothing (Godot never arrives).

2. Instead of having a plot with beginning, middle, and end... Theater of the Absurd features no plot (Act II in Godot repeats the basic pattern of Act I)

3. Instead of having dialogue expressing the play‟s meaning... Theater of the Absurd reveals meaning from both words and deeds that sometimes conflict (Vladimir and Estragon agree to leave, but neither moves)

4. Instead of having either comedy or tragedy... Theater of the Absurd blends elements of unlikely comedy with painful situations (Estragon loses his trousers as he and Vladimir try to figure out how to hang themselves)

5. Instead of having distinctive and varied characters... Theater of the Absurd features less distinctive characters (Vladimir and Estragon have similar backgrounds and dress alike; all the characters are male)

Answers of the Questions :-

1). Why does Beckett grow a few leaves in Act II on the barren tree - The tree has four or five leaves?

The tree represents many things in the play Waiting for Godot. The tree is the only piece of the set in the play, and the entire play takes place next to it. The tree represents life and hope, especially between the first and second acts when the tree inexplicably sprouts leaves. The tree also represents Christ and crucifixion; Vladimir and Estragon suggest hanging themselves from the tree, perhaps a reference to crucifixion, except, instead of dying for humanity's sins, Estragon and Vladimir would be dying for nothing. The tree represents the juxtaposition of existentialism and Christianity that is presented throughout the play. However, many critics and scholars have competing ideas about the tree in the play Waiting for Godot, and its symbolization is highly debated.

2). Can we do any political reading of the play if we see European nations represented by the 'names' of the characters (Vladimir - Russia; Estragon - France; Pozzo - Italy and Lucky - England)? What interpretation can be inferred from the play written just after World War II? Which country stands for 'Godot'?

Vladimir – Russia
Estragon -France
Pozzo - Italy 
Lucky – England

 This interpretation can be inferred from the play written just after World War II. All these countries were lost in their gimmicks and passing time in wait for something good to come out. What actually turned out to be the end of Waiting, in the form of Godot, was the Second World War – the rise of Hitler. Thus, Germany stands for Godot as per this view. 

3). In Act I, in reply to Boy's question:

"BOY: What Am I to tell Mr. Godot, Sir?

VLADIMIR: Tell him... (he hesitates)... tell him you saw us. (Pause.) You did see us, didn't you?

How does this conversation go in Act II? What is the significance?

• "BOY: What Am I to tell Mr. Godot, Sir?

• VLADIMIR : Tell him . . . (he hesitates) . . . tell him you saw us. (Pause.) You did see us, didn't you?

Vladimir’s uncertainty seems to have worsened throughout the course of the play. Whereas earlier he doubted memory and knowledge, he now can’t even accept that actions are true in the moment they occur.

This is interesting; at the end of the play, Vladimir is at his most lucid. He knows he saw the Boy yesterday (and, we can extrapolate, many other days in the past) and he knows he will see him tomorrow. His moment of clarity, however, leads only to fruitless anger. What good is certainty, anyway, in a world full only of unreliability and doubt?

4). In both Acts, evening falls into night and moon rises. How would you interpret this 'coming of night and moon' when actually they are waiting for Godot?

Beckett  wants to highlight the indifferent nature. As Nature never waits for anyone, it doesn't matter whether a person is sad or happy, nature never cares for them. The natural process of the environment never stops for anyone. Similarly in this play Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for Godot, and in this process of waiting they do various things to pass their time, sometimes they feel totally disappointed. But these all things make no change in nature, the day begins as it used to be and night comes as it is, without any change. Beckett very cleverly highlights the indifference nature of human beings through this tree, as in real society also, when someone is suffering, then the other will be happy or celebrating their happy days, no one cares about the suffering. Humans  always remain indifferent towards the suffering of others.

In the other interpretation we can say that 'coming of night and moon' is also signifying the time ,time doesn't stop for us. It is going on if we use it or we waste it. 

5). What is the meaning of the terms 'Apathia, Aphasia and Athambia' in Lucky's speech? "... divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown …".

Those who are exceptions from his care experience life on earth as hell, and this sensation is so strong that it eventually overrides any mote of hope or belief in a paradise beyond their earthly sufferings. Lucky's cynical feelings are innately clear. God is an absent projection entrenched in paradox and if not, then he is defined by "divine apathia" or apathy, a lack of interest, "divine aphasia" the inability to understand or express speech, and "divine athambia" means "imperturbability". He is unfeeling, unseeing, and inattentive.

6). 'A better solution to the tramp's predicament than to wait is, suicide". Is it really so? Why they fail to commit suicide?

In the play "Waiting for Godot," the tramps Vladimir and Estragon are in a state of existential crisis and are waiting for the arrival of a person named Godot. They are unable to act or change their situation and are stuck in a cycle of waiting and boredom.

While suicide may seem like a solution to their problems, it may not necessarily solve anything. It could simply lead to a permanent end to their existence and remove the possibility of finding meaning or purpose in life. Moreover, the act of suicide could be seen as a lack of courage to face the reality of their existence and to take control of their lives.

In addition, it is possible that the tramps may have hope that Godot will eventually arrive and bring a change to their lives. This hope keeps them from considering suicide as an option.

Ultimately, the tramps' failure to commit suicide could be seen as a manifestation of their own desire to live, despite the difficulties they face. It could also be seen as a desire to hold on to hope and the possibility of a better future.

7). Explain: "Godot might become an image of what Sartre calls "Bad Faith"". (Pg 39 in the article)

In Jean-Paul Sartre's philosophy of existentialism, "Bad Faith" refers to the act of denying one's own freedom and responsibility by hiding behind false or inauthentic values and beliefs. It is a way of avoiding the reality of one's own existence.

In the play "Waiting for Godot" by Samuel Beckett, the two main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, wait endlessly for the arrival of a person named Godot. They pass their time with idle talk and repetitive actions, but there is a sense of hopelessness and emptiness in their waiting. They are in a state of existential limbo, unable to act or change their situation.

In this sense, the character of Godot might represent the concept of "Bad Faith." The waiting for Godot becomes a way for the characters to avoid facing the reality of their own existence and the choices they have to make. By waiting for Godot, they can escape their own responsibilities and freedoms, and avoid having to make any real decisions about their lives.

In this way, the waiting for Godot can be seen as an example of "Bad Faith," where the characters are using the image of Godot as a way to hide from their own existence and the choices they have to make.

8). Explain:

"One hardly feels the absurdity of some things, on the one hand, and the necessity of those other things, on the other, (for it is rare that feeling of absurdity is not followed by the feeling of necessity), when one feels the absurdity of those things of which one had just felt the necessity(for it is rare that the feeling of necessity is not followed by the feeling of absurdity)"

This statement suggests that there is a constant flip-flop of feelings between the absurdity and necessity of things. The absurdity of something can quickly become necessary, and vice versa. The feeling of one is often followed by the feeling of the other, making it difficult to determine what is truly absurd or necessary. This highlights the subjective nature of our perceptions and how quickly they can change.

World Count :- 2000

Images :-

Pptx :-

Video :-